Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Thursday, February 15, 2018

Necromancy in Parkland

Necromancy in Parkland at Stonemason High
The Ceremonial Aspects of our National Death Trip

By Michael Hoffman
Copyright©2018 •  RevisionistHistory.org

Nikolas Cruz moments after he was apprehended. Note the image on his sleeve.

The Horus falcon of ancient Egypt.

 On Feb 15, 2018, at 12:59, William XXXXXX wrote:
Hello Michael, 
 In terms of the "Parkland"shooting do you think it is significant that this took place in Parkland, Fla. with the fact that the hospital that President Kennedy died in was "Parkland”? Also the fact these shootings took place on'Valentines Day." Another Valentine's Day massacre! I think there is a lot of symbolism here and would be very interested in your perspective. 
Best regards, Bill
 Is it “Stonemason” or “Stoneman" High School?

 Screen grab from the Google search engine, at 2:36 p.m. February 15, 2018 

StonemasonHigh School 
The killing site is most often referred to as “Stoneman” High,  but sometimes “Stonemason” supplants “Stoneman" in reports by various establishment media. It’s an instructive “mistake.” 

Dear Bill

My gut intuition is that the latest massacre is a contagious death trip immersion: the more we look at it or talk about it, the more our lives get soured.

I agree with you about the symbolism. Yes, Parkland in the context of President Kennedy’s murder and this mass murder, constitutes twilight language, and taken together with the infamous 1929 “The Saint Valentine’s Day Massacre” from the annals of gangland, and we have some haunting parallels. 

The origins of Valentine’s Day are not happy if the fate of its namesake, Saint Valentinus, is any guide:  "According to the official biography of the Diocese of Terni, Bishop Valentine was born and lived in Interamna and while on a temporary stay in Rome he was imprisoned, tortured, and martyred there on February 14, A.D. 269.

Feb. 14 was also the 73rd anniversary of the Allied holocaust in Dresden, where Americans assisted the British in massacring at least 100,000 German civilians. 

Then there is the abortion holocaust to which the media are oblivious. They cherish abolitionist John Brown for declaring that the country had to be purged with blood for slavery:

"I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land can never be purged away but with blood." (December 2, 1859).

But the media will not countenance the possibility that America is being purged for its mass murder of the most helpless and dehumanized in our society — unborn children. And here I am not saying that the innocent souls massacred in Florida deserved to die, or anything approaching such an equivalence. The perpetrator seems to be a demon-possessed individual. Nonetheless the old aphorism, “What goes around comes around,” may apply to our America which increasingly resembles a haunted house.

I’m sticking with my initial intuition: that this is a manifestation of the recrudescent pyramid religion whose focus both now and thousands of years ago, is almost entirely on dead matter. Whether at Parkland in Florida or the "Route 91 Harvest shootings" in Las Vegas last October, we are being forced into attendance upon a ceremonial Dia de Muertos on a national scale, like the Aztec and Egyptian people of old. In the words of H.P. Lovecraft “…behind it all I saw the ineffable malignity of primordial necromancy.

In the short term, all the demon-possessed gunmen like the Florida shooter who are captured alive, should be hanged in public after a fair trial by a jury of their peers (this will prove too grisly for the degenerate liberals however, for whom an ocean of aborted baby blood elicits little or no indignation or offense).

In the long term it will require a moral revolution that commences with sandblasting those pyramid icons off the Federal buildings that exist in every major American city. These are edifices where the display of a Crucifix is against the law — and remove the pyramid from our dollar bills. The Babylonian Talmud states that ten measures of witchcraft were bestowed upon the world and that ancient Egypt received nine of those measures.

 America mystica is occult to the core. It will take another Hercules to clean out these Augean stables of ours, and obtain recognition for unborn human beings — as being, in obvious fact, human

Until then, expect more mass killings, with guns being scapegoated (when some crazed murderer or terrorist mows down people with a truck or an automobile, makers of cars and trucks are not sued in court, and there is no talk of limiting their possession).

The continuation of Michael Hoffman’s work is dependent upon the charity of readers and the sale of his writing and recordings

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

By Michael Hoffman • Copyright©2018

Dresden, Germany, February, 1945

It was Shrove Tuesday, 1945 in the magnificent German art city of Dresden, which was packed with helpless Christian refugees fleeing the Red Army of the Stalinist USSR. Dresden’s native Lutheran and Catholic children, dressed in their festive Saxon folk costumes, were aboard a train taking them home after Mardi Gras parties at different points in the far-flung city. Still merry from the night’s festivities, they cavorted on the train prior to Ash Wednesday, February 14, and the solemnities that would be observed even in wartime, in memory of the passion and death of Jesus. In the sky Allied fighter planes caught sight of the civilian train and opened fire on the children inside, whose blood was soon pouring out of the wreckage.

This carnage registers almost not at all in the American mind. The holocaust in Dresden, lasting two days and killing at least 100,000 people, like the atomic holocaust in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, usually merits not much more than a few sentences or a single paragraph in the back pages of metropolitan newspapers, unlike “Yom HaShoah (יום השואה) Holocaust Remembrance Day,” in April, which is observed with countless civic, educational and media events, hosannahs, apologies and genuflections, from the Vatican to the White House. The barely remembered German and Japanese victims of Allied war crimes were of the wrong race and religion.

In the spring of 1945, after prosecuting the bombing holocaust against every major German city, and with the end of the Second World War in sight in Europe, Winston Churchill began to consider his reputation in the post-war period, when the memory of the 500,000 German innocents he ordered incinerated could come back to haunt him and stain his prestige. On March 28, 1945 he issued a deceitful, back-stabbing memo blaming the mass incineration on his own Bomber Command and by insinuation, upon its commander Arthur Harris, whose force would be denied a post-war campaign medal, and Harris a peerage. Harris and Bomber Command had been only following Winston Churchill’s explicit orders, yet Churchill attempted to shift responsibility onto the corps of airmen who had suffered among the highest casualties of any branch of the British military.

Churchill, like many others, endeavored to blame Germany for being the first to saturate civilians with terror-bombs —at Guernica in Spain on behalf of Franco’s forces, and in Rotterdam, during the war with Holland. In both cases Churchill stated that thousands had been killed. Even one death is regrettable of course, but less than 100 people were killed in Guernica according to historian David Irving, and less than a thousand in Rotterdam, when the Luftwafe accidentally struck a margarine factory and the flammable liquid burned houses nearby. Churchill had said “thousands” died in Guernica, and that 30,000 perished in Rotterdam, which is more than what Deborah Lipstadt says died in the two-day inferno in Dresden (the absurdly low figure of 25,000 is now the officially fixed count to which the “news media” comform without deviation).

The Germans had pledged not to be the first to bomb civilian centers in Britain. Churchill had hoped they would carpet bomb London to give him the excuse to silence the large peace movement in England which was dogging him in 1940, at a time when the Germans had not dropped a single bomb on London, almost a year after Britain had declared war on Germany. The British Prime Minister obtained his pretext toward the end of August, 1940, when a lone, wayward German bomber “lost its way flying up the Thames” river. It had orders to attack an oil refinery, but instead dropped its bombs on London’s East End. No one was killed thankfully, but Churchill was elated. He had the excuse he needed to massively retaliate against Berlin, knowing Hitler would respond in kind, and that the British peace movement would vanish in the smoke and flames of the “Battle of Britain” and the “Blitz.” Churchill ordered a hundred bombers to attack Berlin. Royal Air Force (RAF) commanders warned him that the Luftwaffe would do the same to London. 

At this juncture we pause to contemplate the bloody treason that was at the heart of Churchill’s soul: he wanted as many of his own English civilians in London to die as possible, so he could point to their deaths as the justification for a total war against Germany, and he succeeded in his objective. 

Some of the victims of the Allied holocaust in Dresden

To this day the war crime the leaders of Britain and the United States perpetrated in Dresden is justified on the basis of the tired fable that “Germany did it first to Rotterdam and Guernica,” and “Look at the terror the Germans visited upon London.” Nothing that occurred in Guernica, Rotterdam, or for that matter London, begins to even approach the scale of the holocaust that the firebombs of the air forces of Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt inflicted on Dresden.

On September 4, 1940 Hitler gave a speech in which he stated that if the “mad drunkard” Churchill continued to attack Berlin, the Germans were not going to stand by and take it. It was Neanderthal thinking on the führer’s part: you club me over the head and I will club you. Hitler was almost always outfoxed by the clever machinations of the masonic treachery at the heart of Britain’s ruling class. No matter what Churchill ordered, Hitler should have limited his air campaign to British military sites and munitions factories (the Luftwaffe never bothered to attack the factories that built Britain’s Lancaster bombers). 

On September 6 the English people heard the ominous drone of a fleet of Luftwaffe bombers flying up the Thames. Some 3,000 Londoners subsequently died. Now Churchill had what he wanted. You won’t find these facts in the multi-volume history he wrote, or in the pages of the work of the conformist historians. To learn the truth one must read and study the revisionists, particularly the demonized David Irving, the preeminent military historian of World War II in the Atlantic theatre.

Irving’s nemesis, Deborah Lipstadt meanwhile, has taken it upon herself to deny the holocaust casualty figure of 100,000 for Dresden, but God help any one of us who would have the temerity to doubt the Six Million casualty figure of Holocaustianity, or even to apply the word “holocaust” to what happened in Dresden. 

We challenge any reader to collect the legacy media’s descriptions of the bombing of Dresden from the 1990s onward and count how many term it a holocaust. The extent to which we are imprisoned in an Orwellian dystopia of our own making is revealed when we consider the fact that it is regarded as highly insensitive or indeed “anti-Semitic” to violate the self-appointed Newspeak holocaust trademark appropriated by the Holy People, and apply it to the German cities that were incinerated, or to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though those war crimes were genuine holocausts by dictionary definition: “Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire. Origin: Greek holokauston, from holos ‘whole’ and kaustos ‘burned.”

Even in the liturgy of Holocaustianity it is not decreed that most Judaic victims of the Nazis perished by fire. A half-million German civilians and three-quarters of a million Japanese civilians (including the victims of the fire-bombing of Toyko), were indeed burned to death, yet it is a thought crime to say so. Tell me we are not all cowards for allowing truth itself to be forbidden. We live in Talmudic times.

This writer is sometimes accused, as a researcher in the field of the Babylonian Talmud, of seeing the Talmud where it is not.  It is not so much the Talmudic texts themselves that we observe in our society, but the results of their influence. The single most remarkable dimension of Talmudic halacha is its narcissistic exceptionalism, born of the self-worship it inculcates. Prof. Lipstadt, who has made an career out of stigmatizing anyone who doubts any aspect of the “Holocaust” narrative, as a diabolic “Holocaust denier,” is free to deny, without negative consequences, the holocaust in Dresden, because of her exceptional status as one of the Holy People. She may do as she likes with history, in ways that the rest of us may not. For that reason alone we cannot respect the religion of Holocaustianity. It is not history. It is a product of Talmudic megalomania. Few of us tolerate fanatical egoism from Catholics, Protestants or Muslims. The very idea raises our secular indignation and “Separation of Church (or Mosque) and State!” is our cry, in the face of it. But to shout “Separation of Synagogue and State!” in nations where Holocaustianity is the last truly believed state religion in the otherwise agnostic West, would be unthinkable for anyone who valued their reputation, employment, personal safety, or in Europe, freedom from incarceration.

Beyond the “Jew and gentile” entanglement is the fratricide: Churchill and his top military circle were not Judaic, yet they set afire the medieval cities of their German cousins, who only two generations before had comprised the royal blood within the House of the German-speaking Queen Victoria. 

A thousand years of national and religious wars in Europe had not managed to wreak the destruction which Mr. Churchill and U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt directed against the cultural treasure houses of western civilization, in cities like Dresden. They tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him.

Yet “conservative Christian” American university professors and administrators in institutions of higher learning such as Michigan’s esteemed Hillsdale College, which is the recipient of millions of dollars in donations from “Conservatives” seeking to preserve western civilization, have hallowed Churchill into a paragon of decency, courage and western leadership. This view of this mass murdering vandal is such a defect of vision as to be fatal spiritually, culturally and politically on a national scale.

If the powers that be decided, for example, that Russia needed to be fire-bombed, given sufficient pretext our “Conservatives” would do it all over again in the name of “civilization.” The blood of the innocent in Moscow and St. Petersburg would signify no more to the Hillsdale College type of crusaders than the charred bodies of the civilians in the apocalyptic wreckage of Dresden.

American civilization in 2018 is not worthy of the name. We have the illusion of a civilization, which we cherish for our own aggrandizement and nostalgia. “Conservative” America has made common cause with the Talmudic mentality, as did Antonin Scalia, another of its plaster saints.

At the start of Lent 2018, seventy-three years after the Allies’ mass murder in Dresden, we inhabit the money changer’s house, where Christ on the Cross is sold not just for a buck, but for a bucket of Talmudic vindication.

Michael Hoffman is a professional historian, the editor of the periodical Revisionist History and the author of nine books.

For Further Research

The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945 by Jörg Friedrich. This is at present the most comprehensive history.
 Video: “Saturation Bombing in World War II: Who is to Blame?” A speech by Mr. Irving given in London in 2015. Approximately one hour.

Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. The renowned novelist was an American GI and a German prisoner of war captured at the Battle of the Bulge. He was an eyewitness to the aftermath of the holocaust in Dresden.

Saturday, February 10, 2018

Stephen Cohen’s Defense of Vladimir Putin

Stephen Cohen’s Defense of Vladimir Putin

By Michael Hoffman

In Prof. Stephen Cohen’s speech last December (available on video), defending Russian leader Vladimir Putin, he makes the case that the New York Times, Washington Post and other “prestigious” legacy media are guilty of publishing fake news. Cohen’s speech is a serious deflation of the legacy media's hypocritical hot air balloon accusing its Internet business rivals, such as YouTube and Twitter, of purveying fake news. 

Putin, speaking about the US, declared, “They don’t want to humiliate us, they want to subjugate us. They want to solve their problems at our expense, they want to subordinate us to their influence“. Putin then added, “nobody in history has ever succeeded in doing this and nobody will ever succeed."

He realizes what absolute disaster, a cataclysm of truly cosmic proportions the break-up of the Soviet Union represented for all the people of the former USSR and what an absolute nightmare it was for Russia to live a full decade as a subservient colony of Uncle Sam. 

This is where various right-wingers and assorted Alt-Righters completely “lose” Putin: he told an assembly of Orthodox Jews that 80-85% of Bolshevik leaders were Jews...Putin ignored the hysterics of Netanyahu about the Russian role in Syria...Jews and Russians are forever joined in their common memory of the horrors of WWII....Russia has very strong ties to the Russian-speaking Jewish communities worldwide.

...Putin is acutely aware of the dangers of nationalism, just as much as he is aware of the dangers of imperialism, and he said so many times: Russia cannot afford any more nationalistic conflicts as they almost completely destroyed Russia in the 1990s. Just look at modern Ukraine and you will see what a Russia torn apart by nationalist ideologies could have looked like, had Putin not cracked down hard on various nationalists (including and mostly Russian ones). 

Far from catering to (an admittedly powerful) Jewish lobby in Russia, Putin is, in fact, trying to assemble as many different peoples and minorities as possible to his project of a New Russia; and that project includes Russian Jews, not only for the sake of these Jews, but mainly for the sake of Russia. The same goes for another crucial minority in Russia – Muslims. They also very much form a key part of the project Putin has for Russia. Of course, racists, nationalists and other less than bright folks in Russia will still dream about expelling all Jews (or Muslims) from Russia. Simply put – that ain’t happening (for one thing this would be physically impossible) and Putin and those who support him will fight such projects with every legal tool at their disposal. Here again, you could say that Putin is a patriotic internationalist. 

End quote from "Saker. 
(It's worth taking the time to read his entire essay).

Of course Putin certainly is catering" to the Israeli and Chabad Lubavitch lobby in Russia. 

Putin is a student of Von Clausewitz, Metternich, Machiavelli and Solzhenitsyn all rolled into one riddle wrapped in the enigma that is the Russian powerhouse, which no one detailed better than Dostoyevsky, and as Napoleon and Hitler discovered to their eternal regret.

Anyone who believes the Renaissance papal Church has even one leg to stand on in terms of authentic representation of Christ's ecclesia on earth (and we do not), in our opinion can't object to Putin's statecraft  because in many ways the papist Machiavellian influence is his strongest influence.

Second, neo-Nazis are still fighting World War II and view Putin and Russia solely through that 1940s prism. They have seldom demonstrated the ability to grasp that Hitlerism was understood in Russia as a campaign to eliminate the Slavic people as an independent historical force on the world stage.

 Hitler was viewed as a fool who spared his beloved Britain an invasion by opening a second front in the East in a war he should have known he could not possibly win  as a result he became the biggest loser of the 20th century, along with his prime victims, the German people. 

Russians share one trait with Americans: they can't abide a loser. "Assorted Alt-Righters" can't comprehend the Russian perspective on Hitler: that he almost succeeded in having the German people wiped off the face of the earth.

It was in Communist East Germany in the 1950s-1990s that Germans were preserved from 3rd World immigration, miscegenation, pornography, drugs and other "benefits of the capitalist Western democracies. To this day it is the former East European Communist nations   now free to practice the Christianity which the Soviets had forbidden   that are mounting the only organized government resistance to open borders in all of Europe.

This writer is an anti-communist as well as an anti-usury-capitalist, who notes the failure of the Alt-Right to appreciate that the place of the white race in the world will only be secured by equating our race with peace and justice, not conquest and extrusion. 

The foremost Nazis and Stalinists today are in "Israel" and ISIS. Zionism and Saudi "Wahhabist" Islam are both predicated on mass murder and extrusion of whole populations. 

All politicians deserving of that sordid name, including Mr. Putin, believe that compromise and deceit are virtues in politics. In the sixteenth century, Pope Pius V was ruling an empire of priestcraft, sodomy, usury and Kabbalistic diabolism, yet he helped to organize the naval forces that spectacularly stopped the Ottoman Turk invasion force at the Battle of Lepanto. If the nature of his Renaissance Church is any guide, this pontiff was not a follower of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  God used him nevertheless to save Europe in that era. How do we explain this head-spinning fact? It surely does not signify that we should share in the pope's transgressions by being yoked to the sainthood brand appropriated for him by his Neoplatonic, Hermetic, Kabbalistic Church (2 Corinthians 6:14-17).

God's ways are not our ways. Whether we are dealing with Putin or Pius V, we are encountering men who we, as Christian believers, cannot personally follow. But neither should we close our eyes to how God may have in the past  or may be now  deploying them. The Bible offers numerous examples of ungodly persons used by Yahweh for some good (for instance, Joshua 2: 1-3; 6: 17-25).  This is a mystery.

If the Old Testament contains mysteries beyond human comprehension, what of our human politics and history? 

A prime example is ancient Rome under the Caesars.  It was none other than this "abomination of desolation that was utilized by God to fulfill the prophecy of His Divine Son:

"And Jesus went out from the temple, and was going on his way; and his disciples came to him to show him the buildings of the temple. But he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down...When therefore ye see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him that readeth understand),  then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains..." (Matthew 24: 1-2; 15-16).

The Roman Army that marched on Jerusalem in 70 A.D. was God's army. Go figure. The general who commanded that invincible force, Titus, is, in the pages of the Talmud of Babylon, second only to Jesus Christ in terms of the hatred directed against him in that most sacred of all rabbinic volumes. 

We are not asserting by any means that Pius V or Vladimir Putin were, or are, types of Titus. No one has the authority, much less the competence, to make such a declaration. 

We ought to however, temper our judgments concerning history and politics with a humble cognizance of the mysterious ways of Divine Providence.

Michael Hoffman is the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History® and the author of nine books. The continuation of his work is dependent on the charity of truth-seekers and the sale of his writings and recordings.  

Thursday, February 08, 2018

Court battles of Gas Chamber doubter Faurisson not over

The Battle of Gas Chamber Doubter Robert Faurisson is not yet over

By Michael Hoffman

Le Monde, February 8, 2018

Franz Kafka has nothing on Dr. Robert Faurisson, the French professor who doubts the existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers. He has been more or less perpetually on trial for his  thought crime since he first aired his doubts in his native France in the late 1970s.

At age 89 in 2018 he has not budged an inch and remains as defiant as ever, even after bankruptcy brought on by innumerable court-mandated fines, and a severe beating administered by Zionist terrorists in 1989. He has also been briefly incarcerated (in jail French-Muslim guards extended him courtesies which his countrymen refuse him).

His latest court appearance relates to a defamation suit he has brought against Ariane Chemin, a Stalinist-type scribbler who has labeled Dr. Faurisson a professional liar, on the grounds that whoever doubts the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz, must be a liar.

The French, for all their celebrated masonic secularism, have never truly escaped their ancien regime Jesuit formation. Hence, the old formula of the ecclesiastical heretic-burners: “The proof that you are a liar is obvious  you deny that the Communion wafer is the flesh of Jesus Christ”  is thriving in Paris, 300 years later: 

“...denying the existence of gas chambers is a crime. To say that Mr. Faurisson is a professional liar, it was obvious  Ariane Chemin.

This is the madhouse which these “genius-intellectuals” inhabit. If truth was permitted as a defense, Faurisson would demolish their case, as he did to the “foremost expert historian of the Holocaust,” Prof. Raoul Hilberg, at the 1985 trial of Ernst Zündel. Truth is not a defense, however. 

Faurisson is a heretic. That is all the French (and the West) need to know in order to silence and libel him. Since heretics are no longer publicly burned, they are publicly shamed and defamed, by court order. This is what Faurisson continued to fight today in court, with no expectation of victory and  only a small circle of supporters. In a better world this would be seen as heroic.

The following is a rough translation of an excerpt from today’s edition of the leading French newspaper Le Monde:

The ultimate battle of Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson

By Franck Johannés

...Faurisson appealed a court ruling of 2017 that upheld Ariane Chemin’s allegation that Faurisson was a professional liar and “forger of history.” 

The case goes back quite far, to a declaration by Faurisson published by Le Monde in 1978:

"The so-called Hitler gas chambers and the so-called genocide of the Jews are one and the same historical lie, which has allowed for a huge political-financial swindle, whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism. "

"To deny the existence of gas chambers is a crime

At the appeal hearing on Thursday, the denialist came to support his arguments, accompanied by his younger brother and a handful of sympathizers. The judge, Catherine Bézio did not discern immediately in what trouble she had placed herself. 

Ariane Chemin came to defend his work. "I absolutely assume what I wrote, said the reporter, I'm from the generation of the Gayssot law, for me it is obvious that denying the existence of gas chambers is a crime. To say that Mr. Faurisson is a professional liar, it was obvious.

"What are you basing yourself on to say that he is a liar? Asked the court blandly. 

Slight tremor in the audience in the courtroom at this question

The judge thought she could recover by asking some questions of Robert Faurisson. 

The old gentleman was only waiting for that; he told of his life, his work, his travels to Auschwitz, the content of Pravda on February 2, 1945, the contradictions of Elie Wiesel and Raoul Hilberg, the author of The Destruction of the Jews of Europe   the man is inexhaustible, and it was not easy to stop him.

....The professor of literature (Faurisson) was tried in 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1990, 2007, 2014; and convicted of crimes against humanity in 1991, 1998 and 2006. 

..."I have sinned by naivete, concluded (Faurisson’s accuser) Ariane Chemin. I had not suspected that the battle against Holocaust denial (negationnisme) would have to be be conducted every day. There is a succession of young people who no longer rely on old traditional anti-Semitism, but on the current inspired by Robert Faurisson.”
“...A decision will be given by the court on April 12." 
(End quote, Le Monde)

A postscript:  A phrase has been imposed on the West universally, “anti-semitism.” One must ask, how did it come about that anti-Judaic bigotry has a formal name and category, and institutions and governments devoted to its study and prosecution?  whereas the bigotry of Judaism against gentiles has no entry in the human rights lexicon? What should we term it? Perhaps anti-goyimism would be most apropos. 

Anti-goyimism is as real, indeed it is more real, than anti-Semitism," for who today despises a Judaic because they are of the tribe of Shem, the father of the Semites? 

The haters of non-Jews are legion and they have dozens of sacred halachic texts which instruct them in their hatred: the Mishna, Gemara, Shulchan Aruch etc. ad infinitum. In the Talmud Bavli, there are hundreds of such laws. Here is one, from  BT Avodah Zarah:  

“Jews should not leave small animals alone with gentiles, or entrust their sheep to gentile shepherds, because they are likely to use them to commit bestiality.”

We who are not Jews are prone to have sex with animals  according to the halacha of Orthodox Judaism. Where is there a court that will defend us from virulent racist defamation like this?

The narcissistic exceptionalism of the Talmudists
The hallmark of the Talmudic mentality is the dividing line between the Jew and the goy: one exceptional standard for the 'Holy People' and another for everyone else —  eternal vigilance over outbreaks of anti-Semitism — zero attention paid to theologically-inculcated hatred of Palestinians, and gentiles generally. 
We have written fifteen hundred pages on this subject in two books and many essays. The courts have “not yet” accorded us the Faurisson treatment. Not yet.

Independent History and Research
Box 849,  Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA